MENU

Reverse Innovation: A New World Order for Global Innovation?

December 1, 2016 • INNOVATION, Emerging Ideas

By Simone Corsi & Max von Zedtwitz

Recognising the growing role that emerging economies play in the global innovation landscape, the article provides a measure for the extent of the phenomenon identifying Asia as the main source of a new threat – and opportunity – for Western companies: reverse innovation.

 

Introduction

With production and the supply chain increasingly moving to low-cost countries in Asia-Pacific, and local markets in China and India expanding at three to four times faster than in the US and Europe, creativity and innovation were among the few advantages global managers thought that could be retained in the West.

It appears that even this domain is being taken over by competitors from the Far East.

“Reverse Innovations”, i.e. innovations that are “adopted first in a poor country before being adopted in rich countries” (Immelt et al., 2009, and later Govindarajan and Ramamurti, 20111), or also innovations that were explicitly designed and invented in such developing markets and later spilled over into advanced country markets (von Zedtwitz et al., 20152), are more and more capturing our attention… and our fears: Are established companies in Europe and the US finally losing their last remaining edge, their fundamental source of long-term competitiveness, to new upstarts from Asia? Will Chinese and Indian companies start to out-innovate us now? How serious is this threat?

 

The Threat of Insignificance

Of course, firms from Asia-Pacific have out-innovated us in the West already for decades. Japanese firms have done so since the 1970s, and Korean firms since the 1990s. As significant their contribution to global R&D and innovation was at the time (and still is), it pales to the rise of China and India that is supported by the even more impactful growth in their local markets. This has, for a time, redirected innovation to domestic needs and markets, and misdirected Western companies to believe that they retained an upper hand in their own R&D and innovation effort.



Please login or register to continue reading... Registration is simple and it is free!

About the Authors

corsi-webSimone Corsi is Programme Manager of the Lancaster China Catalyst Programme and Research Fellow at Lancaster University Management School. His work focuses on helping UK SMEs developing R&D collaborations with Chinese organisations. His research interests include R&D internationalisation and reverse innovation. He has a PhD in Management from Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies (Italy).

zedwitz-webMax von Zedtwitz is Professor of International Business and Innovation at Kaunas University of Technology, and Director of the GLORAD Center for Global R&D and Innovation. Previously, he was Professor at Tsinghua, Tongji, and Peking Universities in China, as well as Vice President Global Innovation for PRTM Management Consultants based in Shanghai.

 

References
1.
Immelt, J.R., V. Govindarajan, and C. Trimble 2009. How GE is disrupting itself. Harvard Business Review 87 (10): 56-65. Govindarajan, V., and R. Ramamurti 2011. Reverse innovation, emerging markets, and global strategy. Global Strategy Journal 1(3-4): 191-205.
2. von Zedtwitz, M, S. Corsi, P. Soberg, R. Frega 2015. A Typology of Reverse Innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management 32(1): 12-28.
3. Corsi, S., A. Di Minin, and A. Piccaluga 2014. Reverse innovation at Speres: a case study in China. Research-Technology Management 57(4): 28-34.

 

You might also like:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

« »